Resources

Bringing legal work in-house, explained.

Guides for the teams that own the matter.

Start here

  1. 01

    The economics of bringing litigation document review in-house

    Economics Guide · Sep 18, 2026
  2. 02

    What "defensible AI review" actually means in practice

    Defensibility Guide · Sep 25, 2026
  3. 03

    Per-GB vs. per-matter pricing: a CFO-friendly comparison

    Economics Guide · Oct 2, 2026
  4. 04

    Azure AI Foundry (now Microsoft Foundry) for legal teams: a CIO's primer

    Security & Azure Guide · Oct 9, 2026

All posts

  1. Security & Azure Guide · Oct 9, 2026

    Azure AI Foundry (now Microsoft Foundry) for legal teams: a CIO's primer

    Microsoft Foundry, formerly Azure AI Foundry, is Microsoft's platform for running AI models inside an Azure subscription. When a legal AI platform deploys in your own tenant, your documents, models and sign-in stay under your existing governance, your data stays out of model training, and Microsoft bills the usage at list price.

  2. Economics Guide · Oct 2, 2026

    Per-GB vs. per-matter pricing: a CFO-friendly comparison

    Per-gigabyte eDiscovery pricing ties your bill to data volume you can't know until processing is done, and hosting fees keep running for the life of the matter. Per-matter pricing sets the price by the complexity of the matter before work starts. For budgeting, per-matter is the more predictable model.

  3. Defensibility Guide · Sep 25, 2026

    What "defensible AI review" actually means in practice

    Defensible AI review means you can explain and support every review decision if opposing counsel, a court, or a regulator asks. In practice that takes a written reason for each call cited to the source document, a log of every agent and reviewer action, human sign-off where stakes are high, and quality checks you can describe.

  4. Economics Guide · Sep 18, 2026

    The economics of bringing litigation document review in-house

    First-level document review is the most expensive phase of most matters, and the one legal teams send out most often. Bringing it in-house on an agentic review platform cuts the cost of a representative matter by roughly half, runs about 20× faster than manual or TAR review, and leaves a defensible record your team owns.